More evidence that (and why) induction leads to more caesareans

Two more research studies have added to the concern that women who undergo induction of labour are more likely to end up with a caesarean section than if their labour began naturally.

The first, an analysis of the outcomes of nearly 45,000 women who gave birth in Brisbane, showed that, in women who were 37 or more weeks pregnant, induction of labour was associated with a lower chance of having a spontaneous vaginal birth (Zhao et al 2017).

Women undergoing induction were more likely to have an emergency caesarean section for fetal compromise, but the perinatal outcomes were broadly comparable betwen the groups (Zhao et al 2017). In other words, no benefit was gained by the women and babies who underwent induction of labour in this data set.

In Your Own Time was written to help parents and professionals better understand the issues and the evidence relating to the current induction epidemic. Looks at the evidence relating to due dates, ‘post-term’, older and larger women, suspected big babies, maternal race and more.

The second study looked at 2851 women having their first baby in Pennsylvania, USA. Women who underwent induction of labour were found to be about twice as likely to deliver by caesarean (35.9%) than women in spontaneous labor (18.9%). Much of this difference, the authors argued, can be explained by some of the factors associated with induction of labour: cervical dilatation <3 cm at hospital admission, fetal intolerance of labor, and dystocia. Only 6.2% of the ceasarean sections carried out on women who underwent induction of labour could be explained by factors associated with the reason given for induction of labour (Kjerulff et al 2017). In other words, it would appear that the vast majority of caesarean sections are a result of factors related to the induction process itself and not because of the condition of reason which led to induction being recommended.  The authors conclude that, “increased risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction among nulliparous women is attributable mainly to lower cervical dilatation at hospital admission and higher rates of labor complications” (Kjerulff et al 2017).



Kjerulff K, Attanasio LB, Edmonds JK et al (2017). Labor induction and cesarean delivery: A prospective cohort study of first births in Pennsylvania, USA. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care. DOI:10.1111/birt.12286

Zhao Y, Flatley C, Kumar S (2017). Intrapartum intervention rates and perinatal outcomes following induction of labour compared to expectant management at term from an Australian perinatal centre. ANZJOG DOI:10.1111/ajo.12576

photo credit: aka Quique Esto somos nosotros via photopin (license)

Want to stay up to date and get regular updates on birth-related research and thinking sent free to your inbox?

Sign up to my newsletter list.

Books to help you become informed and make the decisions that are right for you…

3 comments for “More evidence that (and why) induction leads to more caesareans

Comments are closed.