EFM and conflicts of interest

5504534442_276860d5fa“So the question is why would the BRPOs* of the world ignore obvious evidence of EFM harm, ignore informed consent, ignore the violation of mothers’ bioethical autonomy, and ignore the reality that most of the birth profession is lying daily to mothers and themselves about EFM  dangers and forcing mothers to undergo a medical procedure that has the potential for current and future harm?”

             *(birth-related professional organisations)

Another great article from Tom Sartwelle and colleagues, which offers a fascinating history of the use of electronic fetal monitoring and highlights important conflicts of interest as well as a huge gap between the evidence and what most people believe. You can access the full article here.



If you’d like to stay up-to-date with birth-related research and thinking, make sure you’re subscribed to our free newsletter list, which means you’ll get Sara’s monthly Birth Information Update.
And if you’re a midwife or other birth worker who enjoys unpacking research, seeing what’s behind the headlines and sharing wisdom with like-minded others, come and join Sara and colleagues from all over the world in one of our online courses!


photo credit: koadmunkee labor – fetal monitoring via photopin (license)

3 comments for “EFM and conflicts of interest

Comments are closed.